Scholar Evaluation
Evaluate papers, proposals, and literature reviews against a repeatable 9-dimension rubric, with scores, blockers, and concrete revisions.
- What
- Evaluate papers, proposals, and literature reviews against a repeatable 9-dimension rubric, with scores, blockers, and concrete revisions.
- Cost
- Free
- Needs
- Use "Scholar Evaluation" with your Muse.
- Install
- Copy the installer prompt below into your Muse — your agent does the rest.
Curated by Skill Harbor: a structured evaluation workflow for academic and scientific work, from the affaan-m/ECC community contributions. Handles empirical and theoretical papers, technical reports, systematic or narrative literature reviews, research proposals, thesis chapters, and conference abstracts. Scores nine dimensions from 1 to 5: problem and research question, literature and context, methodology, data and evidence, analysis, results and interpretation, limitations and threats to validity, writing and structure, and citations. Includes a defined review process (read abstract, introduction, figures, and conclusion first for the claimed contribution; check the strongest claims against cited sources; separate critical blockers from revision suggestions) and a ready output template with dimension scores, evidence, and revision priority. By @affaan-m, listed here with credit to its creator. From the affaan-m/ECC repository (MIT). Honest caveats: a rubric, not peer review; the score is a summary, never a substitute for concrete feedback. Do not penalize a paper for omitting a dimension outside its scope, and do not treat venue or author reputation as proof of quality. Skill Harbor never reviews the code, review it yourself before use.
Version:
Install
Copy the install package below, then paste it into MuseThe install prompt below already includes the vetting steps: your agent follows the community checklist before installing anything with executable code. Want more?
Use "Scholar Evaluation" with your Muse. 1. Open the skill: https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/main/skills/scientific-thinking-scholar-evaluation/SKILL.md and copy the full SKILL.md text. 2. Paste it into a chat with Muse and add: "Evaluate this paper against the rubric: [paste abstract or link]" or "Compare these two proposals on methodology and evidence: [paste]." 3. Choose the scope first: comprehensive, targeted (one or two dimensions), or comparative. Tip: use the score table as a map, not a verdict; the critical issues and recommended revisions sections carry the real value. Safety: a skill is plain-text instructions; it runs nothing by itself. Keep unpublished manuscripts out of any chat unless you have the right to share them.
Saved to your recent installs. Find it anytime on /connect.
Questions
How do I install a build?
Every product page includes a copy-paste install prompt. Paste it into your Muse and it sets the build up for you — no manual configuration.
Where does my money go?
Straight to the seller. Skill Harbor never processes payments: checkout happens on the seller’s own page, usually Stripe.
What does the ✓ next to a creator’s name mean?
It means we confirmed the identity of the person behind the listing. It says nothing about the code itself — always check a build before installing it.